"Moreover, if conservatives aren't the only politicians to have embraced the free market, the victories of free-market economics can't be explained solely in terms of the opportunistic attempts of leaders to link conservative economic and social agendas. The beliefs of social scientists to the contrary, there is nothing simple or automatic about how people come to define their economic interests. Especially in the absence of organizations like labor unions, which can offer an alternative understanding of how the economy operates, it should not be surprising that the vision of the marketplace itself exercises a certain deep appeal, even for people who do not benefit from the policies it prescribes. After all, the market model suggests that individuals exercise tremendous power over their own destinies. It argues that people can determine their economic fates. It provides a way of connecting one's actions to the larger outcome of social and historical processes. These ideas have their own logic and their own attraction, quite aside from the politics of cultural backlash with which they are frequently joined."
In The Nation, Kim Phillips-Fein reviews Paul Krugman's The Conscience of a Liberal and Jonathan Chait's The Big Con.
Saturday, November 24, 2007
Dealer's Choice
Labels:
books,
Clinton,
FDR,
George W. Bush,
Goldwater,
Phillips-Fein,
political history,
politics,
Reagan
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment