"I realize that I’m begging the question here on a number of levels (and for once I’m using that phrase correctly). We have nearly reached the end of an awards season more tedious, more predictable and more drawn-out than any in recent memory, and in that context it’s tough to evaluate the history or the overall viability of the whole enterprise. Millions will tune in on Sunday night to see the fabulous gowns, tearful speeches and unfortunate production decisions, of course. But hardly anyone who isn’t directly involved this year feels a passionate rooting interest. (I mean, do you?) We can predict the winners in almost every major category, with the possible exception of best actress (although I think Viola Davis has pulled into the lead.) The nominated pictures are almost all tepid and noncontroversial, neither huge popular hits nor memorable cinematic breakthroughs. (The one exception to this might be Terrence Malick’s 'The Tree of Life,' which won’t win anything significant.)"
In Salon, Andrew O'Hehir ponders the upcoming Academy Awards.
Wednesday, February 22, 2012
"How Much Do the Creaky, Crusty Demographics of the Academy Have to Do with the Fact that People Don’t Really Care about the Oscars Anymore?"
Labels:
cultural history,
gender,
middle age,
movies,
old age,
race and ethnicity,
twenty-first century
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment