"Ellis, Beeman, and Philbrick treat the arming of slaves as a footnote, if at
all. In a sense they have no choice, since they focus on a few brief episodes in
the 1770s, when the war was largely confined to the north. But the conflict
drastically transformed when it shifted to the south, in 1778. The new books
virtually ignore the region, instead concentrating on a handful of northern
events that are forced to hold the entire meaning of the Revolution. A longer
view that included the final war years, and by necessity the south, would have
revealed a much more complicated conflict than anything like the Battle of
Bunker Hill can shoulder."
In Slate, Eric Herschthal reviews three new books about the American Revolution.
Thursday, July 04, 2013
"None of Them Seriously Consider Much of the Latest Research"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment