"It had been so easy once upon a time, we mused. If you were a good accountant or lawyer, or worked in sales or almost any other non-blue-collar office job, you put on your dark business suit, white shirt, discreet tie, black oxfords and went to work. It was all rather simple and time-saving and free of nagging choices. You might have incorporated a few personal touches like a pocket square or fancy wristwatch. But you didn't have to worry about whether to wear the tangerine-colored cashmere turtleneck with the fawn suede blouson or the cappuccino-colored, waxed cotton shooting jacket with the puce narrow-wale cords (choices for which there seemed to be no authoritative guidance). As long as things fitted decently and weren’t garish, you were safe. More than a few men have told me they no longer understand what's appropriate for any occasion anymore, except maybe weight-training."
G. Bruce Boyer at First Things discusses men's clothing.
Thursday, May 25, 2017
"The Casual Ethic Is Embodied in This Solitary Figure of Freedom"
Labels:
class,
clothing,
Counterculture,
cultural history,
gender,
nineteenth century,
social history,
twentieth century,
twenty-first century
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment