"From Andrew Jackson to Lyndon Johnson, many presidents have put their confidantes on the bench. But the White House claim omits a key fact. The practice of naming presidential pals began to wane decades ago, and, as John Roberts might say, the wisdom of avoiding cronyism is now a settled matter. The question is whether the Miers choice represents a one-time relapse or a harbinger of things to come."
In Slate, David Greenberg discusses the Supreme Court spoils system.
Wednesday, October 05, 2005
Taney, Fortas, Miers?
Labels:
George W. Bush,
Greenberg,
Jackson,
LBJ,
legal history,
political history
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment