"If the Republicans can propose a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, why can't the Democrats propose a right to privacy amendment? Making this implicit right explicit would forever end the debate about whether there is a right to privacy. And the debate over the bill would force Republicans who opposed it to explain why they don't think Americans deserve a right to privacy--which would alienate not only moderates, but also those libertarian, small-government conservatives who survive only in isolated pockets on the Eastern Seaboard and the American West."
In The New York Times, Dan Savage proposes enshrining privacy rights in the Constitution.
Wednesday, November 16, 2005
Privacy Please
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment