"The Rooseveltian liberal preference for public jobs over cash grants for the poor was shared by the patron saint of natural rights liberalism, John Locke, who in the 1690s proposed that the deserving poor be employed at public expense. Will and Voegeli to the contrary, liberals in the Rooseveltian tradition have always favored public work programs like Roosevelt's Works Projects Administration and Civilian Conservation Corps and Johnson's Job Corps and Volunteers in Service to America as an alternative to welfare payments to poor people able to work. It is conservatives who have consistently opposed public work programs. When FDR's National Resources Planning Board in 1943 proposed using a permanent public works program as an alternative to cash relief after the war, conservatives in Congress killed the agency and buried the report. In 1984, when Congress, led by Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan of New York, created the American Conservation Corps, modeled on the Depression-era CCC, President Ronald Reagan vetoed the bill."
Michael Lind in Salon refutes George Will, William Voegeli, and "Straussian falsehoods about American liberalism."
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
"Individual Freedom Cannot Exist without Economic Security and Independence"
Labels:
Brian Wilson,
FDR,
Jefferson,
LBJ,
Lincoln,
Lind,
Locke,
philosophy,
political history,
Reagan
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment