"Stenner, for example, notes that 'all the available evidence indicates that exposure to difference, talking about difference, and applauding difference … are the surest ways to aggravate [the] intolerant, and to guarantee the increased expression of their predispositions in manifestly intolerant attitudes and behaviors. Paradoxically, then, it would seem that we can best limit intolerance of difference by parading, talking about, and applauding our sameness … Nothing inspires greater tolerance from the intolerant than an abundance of common and unifying beliefs, practices, rituals, institutions and processes.'"
Sheri Berman at The Guardian argues that Trump opponents should "the type of 'identity politics' that stresses differences."
"The idea was that white skin privilege was actually harmful to white people, because despite the fact that they were granted some advantages over black people, they ended up even more entrenched in their condition of exploitation precisely by accepting these advantages. As a result, they did not build a movement across racial boundaries to fight their common oppression. The fact that the idea of white privilege is used today to show why we can't possibly unify—that's a reversal of the core idea."
And in a 2017 Seattle Weekly article, Kelton Sears interviews Asad Haider.
Saturday, July 14, 2018
"Common Values and Interests"
Labels:
2010s,
class,
politics,
psychology,
race and ethnicity,
sociology,
Trump,
twenty-first century
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment