"The point, once again, is to 'reframe American history' so that this appalling history stands at the very center of who we are as a country. Achieving that goal has required the Times to treat history in a highly sensationalistic, reductionistic, and tendentious way, with the cumulative result resembling agitprop more than responsible journalism or scholarship. Putting aside any pretense toward nuance or complexity, the paper has surrendered to the sensibility of left-wing political activists. The result is unpersuasive—and a sad comment on the state of our country's public life."
Damon Linker at The Week criticizes The New York Times' "1619 Project."
Zack Beauchamp at Vox criticizes the critics.
Tuesday, August 20, 2019
"Part of the Solution or Part of the Problem"
Labels:
1610s,
2010s,
history,
journalism,
politics,
race and ethnicity,
seventeenth century,
slavery,
twenty-first century,
Virginia
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment